is reportedly on the block
, and there's no public word on pricing. Investment bankers use pricing multiples from comps (comparable deals) to help gauge how much a business is worth, and three different comparable deals ("comps") give three different pictures of just how much someone might pay for the Wellesley, Massachusetts-based ETF strategist in the wake of its performance reporting scandal and subsequent SEC settlement last year.
As an ETF strategist, F-Squared is a kind of manager-of-managers: it invests the underlying assets on the portfolios it manages (and the Virtus
mutual funds it subadvises) not directly into stocks or bonds but into ETFs managed by other asset managers. F-Squared is privately held, so its earnings figures aren't widely available, so we'll use its assets under management, $15.2 billion as of March 31, 2015, as a proxy, since asset managers' fees are asset-based, and thus their profits are AUM-driven. And for a perspective on what F-Squared might be again if it recovers from the scandal, we can use its $28-billion AUM level from when the scandal broke last year.
Comp 1: Russell
The LSE is trying to sell
the manager-of-managers side of Russell Investments
, which caters largely to institutional clients but also offers mutual funds to gain better 401(k) channel access.
Russell has $273 billion in AUM, and reports offer pricing estimates ranging from $800 million all the way up to $1.5 billion. That translates into a multiple of up to 0.55 percent of AUM.
Using that Russell multiple on F-Squared's post-scandal AUM brings us to a pricing estimate of $83.6 million. With the pre-scandal AUM figure, that rises to $154 million.
Comp 2: American Beacon
Last week a pair of private equity firms closed on their purchase
of American Beacon
, another manager-of-managers focused on the institutional space but with its own mutual funds, too.
As of March 31, American Beacon had $62.9 billion in AUM. No pricing data is publicly available, but reports
in the fall put the price of the deal at $600 million or more. That translates into a multiple of 0.954 percent of AUM.
If you apply that American Beacon multiple to F-Squared's most recent AUM figures, you get a price estimate of $145 million. With the higher AUM figure from the fall, that price estimate rises to $267.12 million.
Comp 3: Windhaven
Like F-Squared, Windhaven
is an ETF strategist, so the pricing match here may be closer. Yet the deal closed four and a half years ago, which makes the pricing more dated.
Brokerage giant (and mutual fund shop) Charles Schwab shelled out
$150 million for Windhaven, which had $4.24 billion in AUM about a month before the deal closed in November 2010. That translates into a much higher multiple than the two deals above: 3.54 percent of AUM.
This comp would put F-Squared's price now at $538.08 million (with the 3/31/2015 AUM figure) or $991.2 million (with the 9/2014 AUM figure).
Do the Comps Apply?
The elephant in the room with F-Squared, though, is what are you buying? F-Squared subadvises several formerly high-flying mutual funds for Virtus
, so buying F-Squared may give you access to Virtus' distribution ... if an F-Squared sale doesn't automatically trigger some kind of "get-out-of-the-subadvisory-deal" option for Virtus. (And Virtus faces lawsuits over the F-Squared scandal.) You buy a brand, tarnished by a performance-reporting scandal, though with the threat of the SEC ended thanks to a whopping $35-million settlement. And you're buying a firm still suffering outflows that recently had to cut up to 25 percent of its 161-person workforce; you can reasonably worry that that $15.2 billion AUM figure will probably continue to fall, at least in the short term.
So maybe all of the above F-Squared pricing estimates would have to be discounted, as those comps above did not involve firms trying to rise after scandals.
Neil Anderson, Managing Editor
Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now