The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Something Is Rotten In the State of Robo-Advisor Valuations Not Rated 2.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Thursday, July 23, 2015

Something Is Rotten In the State of Robo-Advisor Valuations

News summary by MFWire's editors

Robo-advisors are all the rage in Silicon Valley and the press alike these days. Yet for fundsters used to asset-based fees, the valuations of these startups are startling. And for 401(k) industry insiders, the whole robo-advisor craze may seem like deja vu all over again. Is this another bubble?

At their core, most robo-advisors use some kind of computerized model to put individual investors into different portfolios and then manage those portfolios over time. Though billed as competitors to financial advisors, to MFWire robo-advisors look an awful lot like quantitative asset managers, and indeed some of the robos have actually aligned with firms like Fidelity to be able to connect with RIAs and other FAs that have the relationships.

The most valuable robo-advisor currently, at least in Silicon Valley's eyes, appears to be Wealthfront. Its October 2014 round of funding valued Wealthfront at $700 million, against $1.5 billion in AUM. That's a price-to-AUM ratio of 47 percent!

Other robos have smaller price tags, and different price-to-AUM ratios. Betterment's February 2015 funding round values it at between $400 million and $500 million, against $1.4 billion in AUM, translating into a price-to-AUM ratio of 29 to 36 percent. As of its May 2014 capital raise, FutureAdvisor was valued at $75 million, against $600 million in AUM, translating to a price of 13 percent of AUM. And Acorns, as of its April 2015 round, was valued at $83 million, against $25 million in AUM, for a price of a whopping 332 percent of AUM.

Robo-advisors, minus the name, were all the rage in 401(k)s in the 1990s. Most of those startups have since disappeared, one way or the other, yet at least two biggies remain: Financial Engines and Morningstar, both of which are publicly traded. Financial Engines' market cap stood at $2.358 billion at market close yesterday, and as of Q1 2015 it had $109.2 billion in AUM; it's market cap is 2.2 percent of its AUM.

Morningstar is famous for a host of non-robo-advisor businesses, like mutual fund ratings and advisor tools. Yet thanks to offerings like its 401(k) managed accounts, Morningstar had more than $180 billion in assets under advisement and management at the end of Q2 2015. Its market cap at market close yesterday stood at $3.579 billion, which is 2 percent of its AUM.

Or compare robos' valuations to recent asset manager deals. On the high end, earlier this week First Eagle unveiled a deal that values the $100-billion-AUM mutual fund shop at $4 billion, or 4 percent of its AUM. Old Mutual spun off its $214.9-billion-AUM U.S. institutional asset management business, OMAM, in an IPO in October valuing OMAM at $1.68 billion, 0.783 percent of AUM. And last year TIAA-CREF bought Nuveen in a deal valuing the $221-billion-AUM mutual fund shop at $6.25 billion, 2.8 percent of AUM.

Put another way, the robo-advisors' backers are pricing in a lot of growth. To get to Financial Engines' valuation-to-AUM ratio, Wealthfront would have to multiply its AUM by more than 21. They're buying seats at the table for when the robo-advice business takes off. 

Edited by: Neil Anderson, Managing Editor

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2021: Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

  1. IDC Foundations for Fund Directors, Mar 1-2
  2. MFDF webinar - Board Oversight of ETFs, March 3
  3. FinReg Outlook 2021, March 10
  4. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum via Zoom (Midwest), March 10
  5. Irish Funds North American Digital Seminar, March 11
  6. MFDF webinar - Municipal and Taxable Fixed Income — A Multi-Speed Recovery, March 12
  7. 2021 Virtual Mutual Funds and Investment Management Conference, Mar 15-19
  8. Women for Impact - A Call to Action, March 16
  9. SEC & DOL Standard of Conduct Rulemakings — Present & Future Considerations, March 23
  10. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum via Zoom, March 24
  11. ETFGI Global ETFs Insights Summit - ESG & Active ETF Trends, Mar 24-25
  12. MFDF webinar - Asset Management M&A for Fund Directors — Recent Trends and Governance Issues, March 31
  13. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum via Zoom, April 7
  14. MFDF In Focus: Board Oversight of Sub-advisers, April 15
  15. ETF.com Awards 2020, April 20
  16. The 31st Sub-Advised Funds Forum, Apr 20-21
  17. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum via Zoom (Northeast), April 21
  18. FIASI virtual event - ESG in Fixed Income: Shining a Light on Transparency, Apr 22-23
  19. 44th Annual AIMSE Marketing & Sales Conference, May 2-4
  20. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum via Zoom (Southeast), May 5
  21. ICI 2021 General Membership Meeting - Day 1, May 6
  22. ICI 2021 General Membership Meeting - Day 2, May 13
  23. 2021 FINRA Annual Conference, May 18-20
  24. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum via Zoom, May 19
  25. 2nd annual ETFGI Global ETFs Insights Summit - USA, May 19-20
  26. Irish Funds Online Annual Global Funds Conference 2021, May 19-20

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2021
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use