The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Something Is Rotten In the State of Robo-Advisor Valuations Not Rated 2.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Thursday, July 23, 2015

Something Is Rotten In the State of Robo-Advisor Valuations

News summary by MFWire's editors

Robo-advisors are all the rage in Silicon Valley and the press alike these days. Yet for fundsters used to asset-based fees, the valuations of these startups are startling. And for 401(k) industry insiders, the whole robo-advisor craze may seem like deja vu all over again. Is this another bubble?

At their core, most robo-advisors use some kind of computerized model to put individual investors into different portfolios and then manage those portfolios over time. Though billed as competitors to financial advisors, to MFWire robo-advisors look an awful lot like quantitative asset managers, and indeed some of the robos have actually aligned with firms like Fidelity to be able to connect with RIAs and other FAs that have the relationships.

The most valuable robo-advisor currently, at least in Silicon Valley's eyes, appears to be Wealthfront. Its October 2014 round of funding valued Wealthfront at $700 million, against $1.5 billion in AUM. That's a price-to-AUM ratio of 47 percent!

Other robos have smaller price tags, and different price-to-AUM ratios. Betterment's February 2015 funding round values it at between $400 million and $500 million, against $1.4 billion in AUM, translating into a price-to-AUM ratio of 29 to 36 percent. As of its May 2014 capital raise, FutureAdvisor was valued at $75 million, against $600 million in AUM, translating to a price of 13 percent of AUM. And Acorns, as of its April 2015 round, was valued at $83 million, against $25 million in AUM, for a price of a whopping 332 percent of AUM.

Robo-advisors, minus the name, were all the rage in 401(k)s in the 1990s. Most of those startups have since disappeared, one way or the other, yet at least two biggies remain: Financial Engines and Morningstar, both of which are publicly traded. Financial Engines' market cap stood at $2.358 billion at market close yesterday, and as of Q1 2015 it had $109.2 billion in AUM; it's market cap is 2.2 percent of its AUM.

Morningstar is famous for a host of non-robo-advisor businesses, like mutual fund ratings and advisor tools. Yet thanks to offerings like its 401(k) managed accounts, Morningstar had more than $180 billion in assets under advisement and management at the end of Q2 2015. Its market cap at market close yesterday stood at $3.579 billion, which is 2 percent of its AUM.

Or compare robos' valuations to recent asset manager deals. On the high end, earlier this week First Eagle unveiled a deal that values the $100-billion-AUM mutual fund shop at $4 billion, or 4 percent of its AUM. Old Mutual spun off its $214.9-billion-AUM U.S. institutional asset management business, OMAM, in an IPO in October valuing OMAM at $1.68 billion, 0.783 percent of AUM. And last year TIAA-CREF bought Nuveen in a deal valuing the $221-billion-AUM mutual fund shop at $6.25 billion, 2.8 percent of AUM.

Put another way, the robo-advisors' backers are pricing in a lot of growth. To get to Financial Engines' valuation-to-AUM ratio, Wealthfront would have to multiply its AUM by more than 21. They're buying seats at the table for when the robo-advice business takes off. 

Edited by: Neil Anderson, Managing Editor

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2024: Q3Q2Q1
2023: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

  1. MFDF webinar - Lessons Learned from the Regional Bank Volatility and the Impact on Registered Funds, June 18
  2. IMEA webinar - Snapshot on the Talent Landscape, June 18
  3. 2024 MMI National Accounts Roundable, June 18
  4. MMI webinar - RIA Consolidators: The New Key Accounts?, June 20
  5. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum (Philadelphia), June 20
  6. MMI webinar - DoL Fiduciary Rule Update: What Are the Implications?, June 21
  7. WE Chicago - Pre-Morningstar Conference reception, June 25
  8. Celebrating 100 Years of the Mutual Fund, June 25
  9. New York YPEM Cornhole Classic, June 25
  10. Morningstar Investment Conference Conference 2024, Jun 26-27
  11. 2024 MMI Institutional Roundtable, June 26
  12. WE PNW Seattle - Pickleball and Networking, June 27
  13. Celebrating 100 Years of the Mutual Fund, July 11
  14. MFDF webinar - Mid-Year Tax Update for Registered Investment Companies, July 16
  15. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum via Zoom, July 17
  16. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum (New York), July 23
  17. IMEA Portfolio Construction Roundtable, September 19
  18. MFDF Continuing Regulatory Impacts on Fund Boards program, October 15
  19. 2024 MMI Annual Conference, Oct 15-17
  20. IMEA Philanthropic Day, October 22
  21. IMEA Leadership Summit, October 23
  22. IMEA Star Awards Celebration, October 23
  23. IMEA Marketing Summit, October 24
  24. 5th Annual ETFGI Global ETFs Insight Summit, October 29
  25. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum (Denver), November 6
  26. MFDF webinar - Digital Assets in the Fund Space (part 2 of 2), November 7

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2024
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use