The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Fundsters Face Self-Dealing Charges Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Fundsters Face Self-Dealing Charges

News summary by MFWire's editors

If you're a plan sponsor who's offering proprietary funds in your employees' 401(k)s, proceed with caution.

Robert L. Reynolds
Putnam Investments
President and CEO
Two asset managers, BlackRock and Putnam Investments, face charges of self-dealing in their retirement plans. Plaintiffs in both cases allege that the firms prioritized their fund businesses over their fiduciary duties as plan sponsors.

The allegations pose an interesting conundrum: asset managers, in theory, believe that they offer some of the best funds available to investors. So, as fiduciaries of their companies' retirement plans, shouldn't asset managers offer proprietary funds to participants?

Feinberg, Jackson, Worthman & Wasow, LLP and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll are representing the plaintiff in the case against BlackRock. Nichols Kaster PLLP and Block & Leviton LLP are representing the plaintiffs in the case against Putnam.

BlackRock represents one of the first pure-play asset managers involved in a self-dealing suit. Typically, defendants in these cases are both asset managers and recordkeepers (Putnam is an affiliate of Empower).

In BlackRock's case, the plaintiff, Charles Baird, claims that the world's largest asset manager should have used its investing knowledge and bargaining power to benefit participants, our sister publication, 401kWire reports. Instead, the complaint alleges that the plan sought to maximize fees through a system of layering, where BlackRock-affiliated funds funneled assets into a network of additional proprietary funds, and charged participants the fees on all of them.

According to the filing, a total of 21 funds offered in BlackRock's retirement plans used this system of layering. There were instances where a single fund placed assets into an additional 27 funds.

To prove underperformance, the complaint against BlackRock compares performance to similar Vanguard offerings, an argument that was shot down last week by a Judge William G. Young of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Putnam's self-dealing case. The judge said that comparing Putnam to Vanguard was like comparing apples to oranges, InvestmentNews reports.

Future defendants in similar cases, including the suit against BlackRock, may want to take a lesson from the ruling in Putnam's favor.

BlackRock's plan has approximately $1.56 billion in assets and 9,700 participants.

PlanSponsor and InvestmentNews also covered BlackRock's suit.  

Edited by: Katy Golvala

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2021
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use