The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Shouldn't We Stop Calling It That? Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Thursday, April 18, 2019

Shouldn't We Stop Calling It That?

Reported by Neil Anderson, Managing Editor

If fundsters aren't careful, they could be setting themselves up for some branding confusion ... and not the good kind.

Last week the SEC granted conditional approval to a new kind of ETF, Precidian Investments' ActiveShares. As the name suggests, the new structure (which has been awaiting approval for nearly five years) is meant to be more friendly to active management, as it removes the need for such an active ETF to reveal its portfolio holdings daily. And thus was the "non-transparent" moniker born.

Publications of various stripes — including Bloomberg, ETF Trends, the National Law Review, and the Wall Street Journal — ran with variations on that label, non-transparent ETFs. So did BBH and even Precidian itself. Too bad.

From where MFWire sits, "non-transparent ETFs" is a label that is, at best, innocently misleading (because it belies the fact that, like regular mutual funds, Precidian's ActiveShares will still have to regularly reveal their portfolio holdings), and at worst, downright scary. How many investors will get visions of the next Bernie Madoff making their money disappear thanks to a "non-transparent" product?

Transparency is generally en vogue right now, and not just in financial services. Labeling an industry innovation as "non-transparent" might sound like the industry's putting a big "warning, these funds might screw you over!" label on the new products. Investors could be forgiven for not realizing that all the standard mutual fund protections will still apply here.

The ActiveShares name (and the name of a quasi-competitor, NextShares) does avoid running afoul of this problem. But it seems high time the industry comes up with a more investor-friendly description for funds that use structures like this. 

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2024: Q3Q2Q1
2023: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2024
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use