Quantcast
The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Why Fundies Read the WSJ and Not the NYTimes Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Why Fundies Read the WSJ and Not the NYTimes

Reported by Sean Hanna, Editor in Chief

Reason number 872 why fund industry insiders prefer the Wall Street Journal to the New York Times: At least the Fund Track column does not confuse them with the sell side. That confusion between buy side and sell side was apparent in a Monday Deal Book item about why Lehman Brothers is not seeing a line of buyers for Neuberger Berman:

While we’re on the subject of Lehman, there’s a good reason bidders are balking at buying the firm’s Neuberger Berman money management unit.

Any bidder has to pay for Neuberger twice. “You’ve got to pay Lehman, and then you’ve got to pay again to keep the brokers from leaving,” said one banker who has been poking around Lehman on behalf of a bidder.

Unlike some rival asset managers, like BlackRock, for example, which has institutionalized its business, Neuberger Berman is still run as dozens of fiefs. If the buyer doesn’t pay up to keep Neuberger’s talent, the employees — and their clients’ money — will walk out the door.


Last we checked, it was Lehman that employed the brokers and Neuberger that employed the portfolio managers and stock analysts. Of course, the essence of the quote was dead on -- which is why The MFWire believes it must have been the reporter who made a transcription error and not the anonymous banker. Any buyer will have to pay twice: one check will be made out to Lehman and the second to the portfolio teams to keep them from walking and hanging out their own shingles down the street. Ironically for the Deal Book, it is even easier for asset managers to walk than brokers, just ask the folks at Mellon about their purchase of the Boston Company a generation ago.

In an unrelated note: As embarrassing as it is, the Deal Book error is nothing like one made last week at the Washington Post which wrote that: "Fannie Mae has withdrawn from the market for all-day loans, which are considered risky because they require less documentation than traditional prime loans." [emphasis added]

We would like an "all-day loan" too since we get paid tomorrow morning. Where does one apply? Oh, you said "Alt-A loan." Never mind. 

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE

0.0
 Do You Recommend This Story?



GO TO: MFWire
Return to Top
 News Archives
2024: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2023: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Raw XML
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly




©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2024
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use