Quantcast
The MFWire
Advertise | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]
MFWire: Oakmark Funds
MUTUAL FUND FAMILY PROFILES [BETA]
To Update this information contact Editors@InvestmentWires.com or call Armie Lee at 212-331-8995 x111.

Harris Associates
Two North LaSalle Street, Suite 500
Chicago, IL  60602
Google Maps

Contact
Main Phone: 312-621-0600
Web Site: http://www.harrisassoc.com/

Mutual Fund Brand(s)
Oakmark Funds

Research Links
  • SEC Fund Filings by CIK

  • Background:
    Chicago-based Harris Associates, founded in 1976, is the investment advisor to the Oakmark Funds. Harris is an indirect subsidiary of Natixis Global Asset Management.

    On July 21, 2010, Kristi Rowsell was elected president and trustee of the Oakmark Funds.

    Oakmark Fee Case
    In August 2004, three investors in the Oakmark funds sued Harris, alleging that the funds' fees were excessive, thus violating Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, and that the board of directors, who is responsible for approving the fees, was not sufficiently independent. Furthermore, the investors took issue with the fact that Harris charged separately managed accounts for pension funds as little as half what is charged retail mutual funds for comparable services. Annual fees for the flagship Oakmark fund were around 1.05% (now 1.1%). Harris denied these claims, asserting that its fees were reasonable and that the board of directors gave its approval of the fees after careful review. Harris argued that it is less expensive to serve a small number of large pension clients than many mutual-fund investors.

    The suit, which was originally filed in an Illinois federal district court, was dismissed before it came to trial in 2007, holding that Section 36(b) did not permit judicial regulation of mutual fund management fees. In his decision, Judge Frank Easterbrook acknowledged that management had a fiduciary duty to investors but that this responsibility did not imply judicial regulation of management fees was necessary – in short, mutual fund fees should not be capped. That decision was affirmed by the federal appeals court in Chicago last year. In August 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh circuit declined to rehear the case but raised the stakes when the five judges, who included renowned jurist Richard Posner, signed a dissenting opinion stating that the case was ripe for reexamination as there was little incentive for the board of directors to police compensation.

    The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments for Harris v. Jones on November 2, 2009.

    On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court unanimously overruled the Seventh Circuit's dismissal of Jones v. Harris Associates.
    Sponsored Opportunities



    Key People:
    Kristi L. Rowsell
    President, Oakmark Funds, Harris Associates Securities L.P.
    Robert M. Levy
    Chairman and Chief Investment Officer, Harris Associates Securities L.P.
    Michael Neary, CFP
    Managing Director, Marketing & Client,
    Janet L. Reali
    General Counsel, Harris Associates Securities L.P.
    Story Archive for Harris Associates
    Published On Story Headline Publication
    7/21/2010 Oakmark Funds Names its New President MFWire.com
    5/3/2010 WSJ Ponders Criticism of Mutual Fund Directors MFWire.com
    4/14/2010 Fundsters Discuss Jones v Harris in D.C. MFWire.com
    4/7/2010 How Competitive is Mutual Fund Pricing? MFWire.com
    4/6/2010 Supremes Rule on Another Fund Fee Case MFWire.com
    4/1/2010 Will the Supreme Court's Decision Compress Fees? MFWire.com
    3/30/2010 UPDATED: Supremes Revive the Oakmark Fee Suit MFWire.com
    3/5/2010 American Funds Fee Suit Ain't Over 'Til the Ninth Circuit Sings MFWire.com
    1/12/2010 Morningstar Crowns the Fund Managers of the Decade MFWire.com
    1/5/2010 American Funds, Berkowitz and Loomis Sayles Gain Top Manager Kudos MFWire.com
    12/22/2009 Principal Faces a Fee Suit MFWire.com
    11/19/2009 Who Made it to Morningstar's Manager of the Decade Shortlist? MFWire.com
    11/9/2009 How Will the SC Rule on Oakmark? MFWire.com
    11/2/2009 The Supremes Ponder Oakmark MFWire.com
    10/30/2009 Fundsters' Eyes Turn to the Supreme Court MFWire.com
    9/25/2009 An SEC Commish Defends Harris
    And Blasts Money Fund Proposals
    MFWire.com
    9/4/2009 Another Group Backs Harris With a Brief to the Supreme Court MFWire.com
    9/4/2009 The ICI Rallies to Defend Harris and Fund Fees MFWire.com
    8/18/2009 Ariel, RS, Appleseed All Draw the WSJ's Focus MFWire.com
    8/17/2009 How Might the Supreme Court Rule in the Oakmark Fee Suit? MFWire.com
    6/25/2009 An Oakmark PM Packs Up MFWire.com
     News Archives
    2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
     Get RSS Feeds
    Raw XML
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online




    ©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2010
    99 Wall Street | 17th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8999 | F: 212-331-8998
    Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use